Welcome to the new Woodmann RCE Messageboards Regroupment
Please be patient while the rest of the site is restored.

To all Members of the old RCE Forums:
In order to log in, it will be necessary to reset your forum login password ("I forgot my password") using the original email address you registered with. You will be sent an email with a link to reset your password for that member account.

The old vBulletin forum was converted to phpBB format, requiring the passwords to be reset. If this is a problem for some because of a forgotten email address, please feel free to re-register with a new username. We are happy to welcome old and new members back to the forums! Thanks.

All new accounts are manually activated before you can post. Any questions can be PM'ed to Kayaker.

FlexLM.ECC.Generic.Patcher

Questions concerning tools (other than OllyDbg) - IDA Pro, SoftIce, member contributions, etc.
<b>NOTE:</b> You must <b>always</b> make sure you cannot find what you are looking for in our <a href="/collaborative/tools">Collaborative RCE Tool Library</a> before asking for <b>any</b> tools that can do this or that though!
Locked
User avatar
Arlequim
Junior Member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:02 pm
Location: somewhere in Italy

FlexLM.ECC.Generic.Patcher

Post by Arlequim »

Automatic patcher for Flexlm targets (x86/x64 up to version 11.9.x) against CRO protection.
Regards! ;)
Attachments
flexlm.ecc.generic.patcher.rar
(14.07 KiB) Downloaded 3292 times
Theislander
Junior Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:02 am

Thanks

Post by Theislander »

Thanks for sharing.....

Can you also share your pathced lsdecode 8.3.900

Cheers
eb4ever

Post by eb4ever »

Thanks!
poorit2011

FLEXnet Licensing v11.9.0.0 build 87342 i86_n3 (lmgr.lib)

Post by poorit2011 »

Dear Arlequim,

Thanks for your post...

My target use after use FlexLMsearch show that:

1."FLEXnet Licensing v11.9.0.0 build 87342 i86_n3 (lmgr.lib), Copyright (c) 1988-2010 Flexera Software, Inc. All Rights Reserved."
2."FLEXnet Licensing v11.4.100.0 build 50818 i86_n3 (lmgr.lib), Copyright (c) 1988-2007 Macrovision Europe Ltd. and/or Macrovision Corporation. All Rights Reserve"

But When I use your tool "flexlm.ecc.generic.patcher" it show that "Can't find pattern! trying next one...." and after pactched my target still not work can you slove this prbls or let you update the "pattern" againt in your Tool???

Many thank to you and pls check PM to got my target and check for me...
free_sim
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:29 am

Post by free_sim »

Hi Buddy,

Do you have any updated pattern included patcher here?
this one did not work with 11.10 and 11.9 x64.

Appreciate you can share something further.
Also, your another post which mentioned about seed3/4 hand shake stuff, I tested, but
while I changed the value ( 4 values) from daemon and filled within lm_new.c and compile. the filled value will be overwritten by compiler and return to its previous value...

Do you have any tricky operation here? appreciate your further instruction.

you can drop mail to [email protected].

Thanks!

Free_sim.
istigatore
Junior Member
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:11 am
Location: somewhere in Italy

Post by istigatore »

free_sim, In the makefile file of your SDK you need to comment the strings "if exist lm_new.c del lm_new.c"
and "lmnewgen.exe $(VENDORNAME) -o lm_new.c" to prevent rewrite lm_new.c.
Then Recompile your vendor daemon.
free_sim
Junior Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2014 3:29 am

Post by free_sim »

istigatore wrote:free_sim, In the makefile file of your SDK you need to comment the strings "if exist lm_new.c del lm_new.c"
and "lmnewgen.exe $(VENDORNAME) -o lm_new.c" to prevent rewrite lm_new.c.
Then Recompile your vendor daemon.
Thanks! Buddy!
I will have a new try to see.
BTW, Do you have any experience of analysing Common Vendor Daemon?
in detail: what is the checking logic inside? first Primary Daemon and then child one?
since pubkey verify can only map to one set of private keys. So I think child daemon's LM_seeds1-3 will be ignored if primary daemon has a set of pri/pub keys. Is this correct?

if child's pubkey check will be ignored, then what to be checked for child daemon?
handshake checking is just for primary daemon or child daemon as well?

many confusion... thanks for your instruction..... Cheers.

Free_Sim :)
Locked