Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Progress on OllyDGB v. 2.0 - Command Search

  1. #16
    If someone really needed to make an OllyDbg competitor, he still had the little package released as free beer 6 yrs ago to start his own, like ptrace ollydbg-like under linux. Maybe Olly was victim of his own success, maybe as Disavowed said noone wanted to reinvent the wheel. I saw that Oleh do not talk about open source in his faq, you know "Can I have the source ?" _"No because reason".

    my 0.02, cheers.

  2. #17
    ssb
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by squidge View Post
    Well, if Ollydbg was open source, we wouldn't need to, and a group of developers could be developing 2.0, rather than a single person. The plug-in interface is nice, but you can't do everything in it
    If Ollydbg was open source, I'm afraid it would be a buggy unstable crap like many opensource projects.
    I always prefered projects built by a close group of a few (or a single) developers instead by a whole community of fanboys...
    However I do agree with a more open architecture suggestion.

    Just my humble opinion though
    Last edited by ssb; May 31st, 2007 at 04:21.
    I promise that I have read the FAQ and tried to use the Search to answer my question.

  3. #18
    Uh Oh, who said troll, don't feed it pls..

    If Ollydbg was open source, I'm afraid it would be a buggy unstable crap like many opensource projects.
    Last edited by Silkut; June 1st, 2007 at 03:37. Reason: Not clear enough regarding to squidge :)

  4. #19
    You calling me a troll? :P

  5. #20
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,486
    Blog Entries
    15
    check out part five "Magic Analysis Of Mingw"

    does it sound like harry potter and hell of fire ?

  6. #21
    Ohh neat, even IDA doesn't yet support GCC's non-push arguments.

  7. #22
    <script>alert(0)</script> disavowed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,281
    __fastcall?

  8. #23
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,486
    Blog Entries
    15
    dont know but i have seen forth compiled executables doing that kind of
    mov esi,callparameters
    mov edi,esp+4
    repmovsd this fills up the stack with parameters
    and then calling

    never compiled mingw

  9. #24
    __fastcall is different, it just uses registers for parameters. GCC still uses the stack, but doesn't push them.

  10. #25
    <script>alert(0)</script> disavowed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    1,281
    I miss the days of non-optimizing compilers... reversing was so much easier then

Similar Threads

  1. Command Line
    By andresiraola in forum OllyDbg Support Forums
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 19th, 2005, 13:23
  2. Saving Progress In Ollydbg
    By getsome in forum OllyDbg Support Forums
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 18th, 2004, 15:11
  3. [plugin] Command Bar 1.08.02
    By Gigapede in forum Plugins (General)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 29th, 2003, 10:55
  4. Windows Command Keyfile
    By squidge in forum Advanced Reversing and Programming
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 12th, 2002, 18:49

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •