PDA

View Full Version : Farcebook


wbe
April 20th, 2011, 22:05
How about it?

http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/1797/nofacebook.png (http://img593.imageshack.us/i/nofacebook.png/)

CluelessNoob
April 21st, 2011, 08:28
Love it.


Woodmann
April 23rd, 2011, 20:03
Shit,

I hope nobody made a F book page about this place.
I fucking hate that shit.

Woodmann

wbe
April 24th, 2011, 03:10
Not having a fan or follower on those "social!" sites makes this place a serious one. Things and trends get topsy-turvy when you are on the Internet.

CrackZ
April 24th, 2011, 07:57
This will be worth billions of $ in 3 years ;-).

Woodmann
April 24th, 2011, 20:51
I like this one:

2455

![Ry4n.4pr1l]!
April 26th, 2011, 16:11
facebook makes us get lower grades and ruins relationships..

www.sickfacebook.com

I'm glad I've locked down mine, and only play potfarm... lol

I turned facebook into a experiment into social engineering, so many unexpected results..

Woodmann
April 26th, 2011, 21:22
@ !{[90 leeto named dude}]0)

Checked your site and looks legit.

How the fuck did you end up here?
Tell me the truth or Ye shall be banned
for a lame attempt at fishing for hits/visits
to your site.

Well ?

Woodmann

![Ry4n.4pr1l]!
April 27th, 2011, 15:17
I am already 'banned' (technically speaking).. I just re-encapsulated myself to be closer to myself...I changed my name to be away from the 'feelings' that where in my past.If that was to cryptic for you...

It's not 'my' site its just what I found when I googled 'I hate facebook', and that link popped up showing the OP's excellent picture.I thought it a good way to 'open' the door.

I tried editing my signature to show 'this fact' before 'posting'..but I was denied this for reasons I don't understand, 'yet'..I tried to prevent the question with the truth before you asked.. yet I am thwarted at every turn it seems..your 'ip' logs should verify this for Ye...

How is that for truth.

regards...

Woodmann
April 27th, 2011, 21:27
Howdy,

The only reason why I asked was you seemed, hmmmmmmmmmmm.......
I dont know how to explain it.

Anyway, I would have never guessed such.

Woodmann

![Ry4n.4pr1l]!
April 27th, 2011, 23:02
I was foolish, and my anger is something I battle against every moment of my life..
The fact that it is 'quick' to point fingers is my fault ..I have 1 other thing to say to someone I probably offended..I'm sorry, I read into the words that where laid 'to much' and I did not take kindly to differentiating between ones 'choice of color' to ones 'choice of friends or partners'..even in word play..

Again sincerest apologies to the person, who unintentionally 'made' me, see that.. (metaphysically_speaking(Of_Course))..

Maidir le*(:chodzi:Was = x * respeita = regards and Me..(respeita isn't pure but I'm digging that now..)

Aimless
April 28th, 2011, 00:14
No probs Banme.

Happens to the best of them.

Peace.



Have Phun

![Ry4n.4pr1l]!
April 29th, 2011, 16:18
@Woodmann: You got the truth, now I am requesting a bit myself.. This one is something buried in time, and I really enjoy your answers.

What happened between you and +tsehp, and why?

I 'ask' this question because I wanted to learn more about Project9...To that effect I tried emailing tsehp to try to see if I could attain copies of the information(no such yahoo exists..) that intrigued me and I want to know 'why'..So I searched the forum for tsehp and came across a interesting post that suggested some hostility..So further down I wanted to dig and I googled http://tsehp.cjb.net and low and behold I find JMI eluding to something 'personal' between you two 'way' back on exetools, but I want the meat of the story. I know the 'offense' he used was a flash of anger that I myself can see was a assault on the teachings and for that forgiveness and reconciliation 'might not be due this "time"...' But as someone said 'I like hitting the bull between the eyes, for it just angers him more and that anger is my weapon'. maybe that was me that said that.. but w/e..it was paraphrased..)

I ask out of shear curiosity...and a little devil told me too..ya that's him right their..

regards Ry4n

JMI
April 29th, 2011, 18:46
Since that thread post clearly states the disagreement was one:

"which does not need to be and will not be discussed here"

why would you think we would make the issue "public" just because "you" are curious about it???

What is so special about "you" that such "private" matters should be disclosed to/discussed with "you" just because "you" are curious?

Woodman is, of course, quite capable of stating his own opinion and it is his decision to make.

Regards,

![Ry4n.4pr1l]!
April 29th, 2011, 20:32
Well that is the 'ultimate' question isn't it..The one with venom in it..
Yet it was because of your answer that I asked "That question"..So maybe 'that question' isn't the 'best' way to understand 'even' the premise of what Microsoft made us lose due to threats..(This started 'here' really..) and being that we are under the assumption of 'blaming' Microsoft() maybe a 'email' from them would render my question moot, but needless to say I am asking why can't it even be 'discussed'. Will they still sue you? Also Woodman 'told me to 'run' on instincts..' My instincts took me here.

Woodmann
April 29th, 2011, 22:18
Howdy,

Dont ever stop poking around for answers.

As for J, well, you all know the old bastard by now,
he is my front line "secret service" type guy.
Dont hold any hate towards him, he's just doing
as I have asked him.

As for what really happened, it has been a long time now
and my mind gets hazy BUT, I will try to recall what
happened after reviewing a few things.

Your reply will be by PM.

As for the rest of you's that want to know,
it's was simply a mis-understanding.
A language issue was the basis of it.

Woodmann

Addendum.
I have asked him to return but received no reply.
I still wish for him to come back.

![Ry4n.4pr1l]!
May 1st, 2011, 17:59
I deleted this information..it is self incriminating and confusing to me..to answer truthfully...for it hurts someone I don't hold hate for...I cannot have that anymore..Sorry JMI...you are the only one that can request this information if you so desire it.. But it will hurt your pride and cause utter fury.. please do not request it..

Darkelf
May 2nd, 2011, 04:01
Guys, guys, guys...

reading this thread, I must come to the conclusion that my english is either by no means elevated enough to follow your discussion or you are writing encrypted.
So far I thought it's only threads from this guy who thinks the whole world is a conspiracy against Allah or those from our beloved musician member that I cannot follow - and now you guys do this also
What the hell are you talking about? Well I'm pretty sure, it does not concern me and therefore I better should shut up, but whenever I come across a thread like this where I don't get anything, it makes me feel like taking some lessons in english.

Well, don't take this too serious (except the part with the lessons).

Regards
your little Darkelf

![Ry4n.4pr1l]!
May 2nd, 2011, 08:03
I would thank you repeatedly for that small bit of guidance ...Thank you Darkelf...

To answer your questions ...even though I don't 'fully' get it yet...There is a Solid state that one can achieve by applying 'every bit of knowledge' you have to everything around 'you'.... o0 Some knowledge I think is forbidden for there uses have good and bad qualities, you can find a lot of that in my code(DNA).. For it is wrought with doubts in our self and other nasty creatures and virus's..

one of these pieces of knowledge that should be forbidden is social engineering as with 'facebook'..so all experiments stop.. now for me on this..but I would teach it to you if you asked the right question about it..

I celebrate this day.. much more then any 'religion' or effect could achieve by itself ...o0


regard Ry4n.. and you must've zen reversed me jumping up and down at bin laden being dead..o0 grats..

Maximus
May 2nd, 2011, 08:09
well, tbh i often talk in english and usually read in it - still, the posts of this guy are utterly unintelligible, as few other pointed out too.

The 'problem' (theoretically speaking) lies in the fact he considers much of his 'private space' as shared, interpersonal one. From a (simplified) communication-theory point of view it means he uses words pointing to his personal facts/events/thoughts as if they were part of a common background/knowledge, which leads to having alot of people wondering where his words/symbols 'point to'.

You can find a somewhat similar language usage when you talk with your (very very) close friends - there you often omit subjects, or use them with references to events/facts that are part of your exclusive background. When, in an hyphotetical group with him and other guys, you use such form of communication as if it were normal, you'll notice puzzled people around that maybe asks you: 'what are you meaning'?

In other words, imagine you were talking to a third persion with your close friend, 'winking' with every expression or so to another meaning known only by you two, but not him (=the 3rd guy). You may think that in such talk you are using an higher and richer level of communication, but in truth you are not: sure, it is richer toward your very close friend, but toward the other guy (all us woody posters i'd say) the communication level is *poorer*.

Regards,
Maximus

Woodmann
May 2nd, 2011, 21:18
He speaks in the +f tongue. With a touch of eval.

Sometimes the riddles become annoying, especially to
non native english speakers. I dont have as much trouble
understanding them. But then again I have years of +f
and eval speak under my belt.

He may be the love child of +f.
Or son of eval???

Woodmann