View Full Version : disable memory func in safe key

September 15th, 2007, 08:25
hello there all
i have hardlock working fine with safe key
but with the new software not working asking for licince but with the orginal dongle dont need licince

how this happen i figerud that the old software dont need memory and run automatic

new software reads memory but not active acording to toro monitor >>reads memory>>then no device avaliable

no i filled the memory in the fst file

also software not runnig and ask for licince keyy

now all the diffrence between the emulator and orginal dongle after filling memory no device avilable

soo how to disable this function in hardlock emulator from safekey

September 15th, 2007, 23:09

September 18th, 2007, 20:31
then what llx all i want to disable the memory check in for meory however it reads it
Hardlock In:> HL_READBL: ModAd=11604 (0x2D54)
Hardlock Out:> HL_READBL: ModAd=11604 (0x2D54) -> Status=STATUS_OK

Hardlock In:> HL_READBL: ModAd=11604 (0x2D54)
Hardlock Out:> HL_READBL: ModAd=11604 (0x2D54) -> Status=STATUS_no device available

i need the emulator to act like this STATUS_no device available

September 19th, 2007, 01:51
What have YOU done in an attempt to find the answer to YOUR question? This is not a "do this for me" forum!

September 21st, 2007, 18:40
[Originally Posted by LLXX;68648]What have YOU done in an attempt to find the answer to YOUR question? This is not a "do this for me" forum!

here what doo i field the memory in safe key fst how ever it was encrypted in all monitors

all what i have to do is disabling a function in safe key emulator
thanks for your interest

September 22nd, 2007, 07:06
memory filling probably isnt good enough.. are you sure you know what you're doing?
and your answer wasn't very informative either....

September 22nd, 2007, 17:33
thanks for reply

i know what i did in filling memory

the memory request was right

as requested from orginal dongle

by the way is there is 9x emulator ?? for hardlock
dont remembre

September 22nd, 2007, 17:43
If YOU don't remember whether there is an "9x emulator" for hardlock, then YOU do some research on the net and seek the answer to YOUR question.

That is something required by our Rules, which you apparently didn't bother to read.


September 22nd, 2007, 17:58
thanks for reminding me jmi

by the way you did not answer my pm

September 22nd, 2007, 18:06
The answer to both your PMs is the same answer I just gave you. It is obvious that you have NOT read the FAQ or you would know that you are required to show that YOU made an effort to solve your own problem by searching, yourself, both here and on the net for answers BEFORE you post a question on these Forums.

You were reminded about actually reading the FAQ and following its direction by LLXX and you clearly STILL have NOT done so.

We do not condone lazyiness and/or lack of personal effort here, and, so far, you have failed to show any effort on YOUR part to answer your own questions, other than posting them here. If you have made ANY personal effort to find the answers to YOUR questions, you have not shown any of that effort here or claimed that you have made such and effort.

Again, these are things which YOU would ALREADY know, IF you had actually READ THE FAQ!!