PDA

View Full Version : Server Crash!


JMI
09-11-2007, 07:20 PM
Sorry for the down time. I ran a standard "yum update" for the server and, apparently, it didn't like the new kernel which it downloaded and died.

I believe everything is back up there. Let us know if something is missing.

We are going to limit updates to security critical services in the hope of avoiding such problems in the immediate future!

Regards,

wtbw
09-12-2007, 12:45 AM
Thanks guys!

Can no longer access the thread about the T2 challenge though... did it get lost?

http://www.woodmann.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10444&goto=newpost was the link according to my RSS - now says I don't have permission (maybe a new one stole the thread ID?)

Cheers,

Will

Kayaker
09-12-2007, 01:00 AM
Unfortunately we lost a couple of threads since none of us had a more current backup at the time of the crash. If we had known a crash was coming there would have been a backup ready. But then if it had been known that a crash was coming... hmm there must be a paradox there somewhere..


The T2 challenge and the ARTeam tut threads were lost. If members want to reconstruct these threads from memory, or imagined memories, then please feel free to.

Kayaker

evlncrn8
09-12-2007, 01:40 AM
maybe do the m$ practice, backup before applying update / service pack

LLXX
09-12-2007, 03:59 AM
The Goggles do something for once:

http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:39JnyAH6vdUJ:www.woodmann.com/forum/showthread.php%3Fp%3D68490+site:*.woodmann.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=ca&ie=UTF-8

http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:JwR6CJWOYTAJ:www.woodmann.com/forum/showthread.php%3Fgoto%3Dnewpost%26t%3D10451+site:*.woodmann.com&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=ca&ie=UTF-8



edit: You might want to fix the un-linkifier (?).

Naides edit:Sorry for the edit, LLXX, I removed the [url] and placed as [CODE] so VBulletin software shows the whole text of the link.

Kayaker edit: un-linkifier re-linkified :-)

evlncrn8
09-12-2007, 04:02 AM
only seems to have the first page tho

LLXX
09-12-2007, 04:04 AM
Quote:
[Originally Posted by evlncrn8;68435]only seems to have the first page tho
Because Google isn't watching this place 24/7, you know.

MarcElBichon
09-12-2007, 06:48 AM
Few more posts from SecuRom's thread :
Code:
http://rapidshare.com/files/55128542/SecuRom.7z.html

JMI
09-12-2007, 07:33 AM
Thanks, but it is not a 'simple' matter to reconstruct a Thread, particularily when the ThreadID has been overtaken by a new Thread.

Shub-nigurrath is invited to repost his notice of the new tutorial notification:

ARTeam: Special Issue For SecuRom 7.30.0014 Complete Owning, AnonymouS, Human, deroko

and people may post their comments again.

Regards,

evlncrn8
09-12-2007, 10:00 AM
will i be told off again jmi?

JMI
09-12-2007, 12:11 PM
That depends entirely on whether or not your "comments" remain "objective" or become "personal," as I mentioned before.

I've already allowed you to "huff and puff" a bit more than is really necessary in the exetools Thread.

Regards,

evlncrn8
09-12-2007, 10:03 PM
heh ok, i'll try to be objective

Woodmann
09-12-2007, 10:19 PM
For the love of all things not holy.......

Quote:
That depends entirely on whether or not your "comments" remain "objective" or become "personal," as I mentioned before.


By all means give JMI a hard time . Do whatever you desire to him.
I will "spank" him if he gets to bitchy .

I can remember way back when the current moderators would give me a TON of shit when I screwed up the server and I PAY FOR IT.

The least you all can do is give him some shit on my behalf .

Thanks and good night, Woodmann

JMI
09-13-2007, 01:23 AM
I guess it just doesn't pay to ever give "big pappa pump" a hard time. Look see. Now he's inviting "everyone" to help him get even.

Go ahead. Hit me with your best shot.

Regards,

CluelessNoob
09-13-2007, 08:00 AM
Quote:
[Originally Posted by JMI;68441]Thanks, but it is not a 'simple' matter to reconstruct a Thread, particularily when the ThreadID has been overtaken by a new Thread.


I thought this was a reversing forum...

naides
09-13-2007, 10:34 AM
do{
Code:
Whip: Hooosh.....whack!

JMI: Arrgghhh!!!


}

until (Blood_Flesh_Brains_eyeballs_scattered_all_over_the_place == true);

JMI
09-13-2007, 11:54 AM
gurgle, choke, whine, cry!

Regards,

CluelessNoob
09-13-2007, 12:51 PM
Quote:
[Originally Posted by naides;68473]do{
Code:
Whip: Hooosh.....whack!

JMI: Arrgghhh!!!


}

until (Blood_Flesh_Brains_eyeballs_scattered_all_over_the_place == true)


Bad coding style...

until (Blood_Flesh_Brains_eyeballs_scattered_all_over_the_place == true)

should be

until (true == Blood_Flesh_Brains_eyeballs_scattered_all_over_the_place )

Put the constant first and you'll never get tripped up debugging = vs. ==


JMI
09-13-2007, 12:56 PM
Oh God! That makes me feel much better now.

Regards,

Woodmann
09-13-2007, 04:14 PM
You all are too witty .

disavowed
09-13-2007, 08:01 PM
Quote:
[Originally Posted by CluelessNoob;68479]Put the constant first and you'll never get tripped up debugging = vs. ==

Yes, I've been following that coding style for the past few years, and it drives me crazy when I need to compare two variables because I try to think about which would be best to have on the left and which best on the right from a style point-of-view